Engineers keep working in Azure DevOps. Teamhood syncs two-way and adds what ADO doesn't have natively — a real Gantt with baselines, cross-project portfolio, org-wide workload, and time-tracking with cost and profitability.

Trusted by technology and engineering teams

Your engineers are happy in Azure DevOps Boards. But when a PM or lead needs a real schedule, a portfolio across projects, or a view of who is over-allocated, ADO comes up short — so the plan ends up in exported spreadsheets. Teamhood gives leaders that view without moving engineers off ADO.
Keep everything ADO does well for engineers. Layer on the planning capabilities it doesn't have natively — synced two-way, near real-time.
| Capability | Azure DevOps + Teamhood | Azure DevOps alone |
|---|---|---|
| Real Gantt with baselinesADO Delivery Plans is a calendar — no baselines | ✓ | ✗ |
| Critical-path analysisNot available in Azure DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cross-project portfolio roll-upADO roll-ups don't cross project boundaries | ✓ | ✗ |
| Org-wide resource workloadADO capacity is per-team, per-sprint only | ✓ | ✗ |
| Time tracking with rates, cost & profitabilityADO tracks work hours, but no rates or cost | ✓ | ✗ |
| What Azure DevOps already does well — kept intact | ||
| Kanban boards with swimlanes & WIP limits | ✓ | ✓ |
| Work-item dependencies & multi-team timeline | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engineers keep working in Azure DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Setup | Two-way syncFrom €9/user/mo | No change neededengineers stay in ADO |
Link your ADO project. Teamhood maps work items, status, assignees, story points and more, with configurable field mapping.
PMs and leads get a real Gantt, cross-project portfolio, workload and time tracking, on top of the same work items.
Updates flow both ways, near real-time. Developers keep working in ADO Boards, with nothing to migrate.
Yes. Teamhood gives Azure DevOps work items a real Gantt with task dependencies, baselines and critical-path analysis, synced two-way and near real-time. Azure DevOps' own Delivery Plans is a multi-team calendar with predecessor/successor links, but no baselines or critical path.
No. Teamhood sits on top of Azure DevOps via two-way sync. Developers keep working in ADO Boards exactly as they do today; PMs and leads plan in Teamhood. Updates flow both ways automatically — nothing to migrate.
Yes — near real-time, two-way. Adding, updating or completing a work item in either tool updates the other. Field mapping is configurable (Title, Description, Status, Assignee, Story Points, Tags and more).
Yes. Teamhood rolls up across projects into a portfolio view and shows org-wide resource workload. Azure DevOps roll-ups don't cross project boundaries, and its capacity planning is per-team, per-sprint.
Yes. Teamhood adds time tracking with hourly rates, so you see the cost and profitability of work synced from Azure DevOps. ADO tracks work hours but has no rate or cost fields.
Yes — built in the EU (Vilnius, Lithuania), with EU data hosting and dedicated-server/on-premise deployment options.
A real Gantt, portfolio, workload and profitability — on top of Azure DevOps, synced two-way. Your engineers don't change a thing.
© 2019-2025 Teamhood ®