Select topic
Table of contents
What if you didn’t have to pick a side? Combining Agile and Waterfall methods can boost efficiency and flexibility, helping you stay competitive.
Project managers often face the challenge of delivering projects on time, within budget, and to high-quality standards. While the Critical Path Method (CPM) has been a staple in Waterfall planning, Agile’s focus on incremental delivery and customer needs is gaining traction.
So, hybrid project management combines Agile flexibility with Waterfall’s structure, creating a customizable approach to project delivery. You don’t have to choose one over the other.
Hybrid project management is a technique where high-level project phases are planned using the waterfall approach, and project phase work (actual tasks) execution is done the Agile way – according to the Project Management Institute (PMI).

In essence, hybrid project management methodology combines Waterfall’s structured planning with Agile’s flexibility, so teams can define high-level phases while executing tasks in Agile sprints.
Combining Agile and Waterfall addresses many common project challenges, creating a more adaptable and effective management approach. The result of the combination is also logical. However, achieving that combo is not easy or trivial; certain conventions must be established. Let’s look at a short video to get a better grasp between the two.
Some might think that using one project management methodology – let’s say Agile – would be much easier than combining two. But here’s the deal – hybrid project management opens more doors, so why not give it a go? Of course, there is no perfect methodology, so you’ll also have to deal with some roadblocks along the way as well. Here’s a short break down of the benefits of hybrid project management:
There’s no methodology without some quirks. So, here are a few:
Hybrid project management works best when various parts of a project need different approaches. Here are a few examples where combining Agile and Waterfall makes the most sense:
While there are many project management methodologies to choose from or even combine, based on popularity and their inherent differences, there are only two real contenders — Waterfall and Agile. To make a reasonable choice, we should first understand the specifics of each methodology.
Waterfall Project Management: Key Elements
Best for: well-defined and strictly known outcome projects.
Agile Project Management: Key Elements
Best for: projects where the end goal isn’t clear enough.

We are big believers in comparison tables to put things side to side. Comparing methodologies is not easy, but it can still be done side by side to the most extent.
| Waterfall project management | Agile project management | Hybrid project management |
|---|---|---|
| Project Work Breakdown Schedule | Project Backlog | Phase Backlogs |
| Detailed project planning | Iteration planning | Flexible or fixed-budget |
| Agreement of goals with constant learning and adapting via smaller goals | Focus on the early result | Agreement of goal with constant learning and adapting via smaller milestones |
| Focus on stages | High-level planning + iteration planning | Focus on end result for each phase |
| Emphasis on documentation and details | Emphasis on value delivered | Emphasis on value delivered |
| Fixed budget | Variable budget | Estimated or well-defined goals |
| Well defined goals | Unclear or estimated goals | Fast-paced delivery |
| Long to medium duration | Short to medium duration | Any duration |
| Great when resources are partially available | Works best when resources are fully available | More flexible when resources are partially available but still works best with full availability |
| Time critical delivery | Time-critical delivery combined with fast pace for early learning | Time-critical delivery combined with a fast pace for early learning |
| Fixed scope | Unknown/variable scope | Fixed or somewhat variable scope |
| Harder to change | Easiest to change | Easier to change |
| Precise estimations | Abstract estimations | Abstract estimations |
Waterfall vs Agile vs Hybrid project management.
Note: you can also get this table as an image here.
Before diving into actual hybrid project management software, we need to understand how to merge these two ideologies clearly. This is why we provide simple examples to get you up to speed with this potentially game-changing approach. This allows you to use Kanban and Gantt charts at the same time.
First of all, we will use the waterfall approach only for high-level deadlines, deliverables, and contracts with customers:
Secondly, introduce Agile execution cycles for project tasks
Finally, make sure you can monitor progress and steer accordingly by:
It is highly recommended that the best practices of Agile ceremonies be followed to ensure there is a continuous process to raise the quality of work being done and the approaches being taken.
Shortlist which is not limited to suggested ceremonies (practices/meetings):
The simplest example of hybrid project management can be given to a traditional IT project where software must be developed alongside its infrastructure. While it is natural to go for Scrum in the software part, it is not so in the infrastructure part. Procurement, vendor management, and installation are classic Waterfall with dependencies. Hence we provide this oversimplified example just to visualize the idea of how such a hybrid approach can work.
If you want to learn more details, keep reading the post or check out what Teamhood as a project management tool is capable of.
To successfully implement hybrid project management, ask yourself the following key questions:
If you have ticked all 5 with a YES, you can run your projects hybridically and enjoy the benefits of hybrid project management.
If not, you should take the necessary actions to make most of those points a YES before starting your first project. Knowing is not enough, especially when combining techniques/methodologies. It would be best if you had well-seasoned people who would steer the process and project on both bright and dark days.
From our experience, the hardest part could be to convince project stakeholders to do it differently, especially if stakeholders are external parties. Aligning and proposing the benefits can be a project in itself!
The unfortunate problem that most professionals face is that their companies are far too invested in CPM or Agile. This results in tooling, which is also far stretched to support one of those methodologies.
What should be the core features of a tool to support Hybrid project management?
We have shortlisted the top tools in the hybrid project management space. Our visual project management tools post includes a full comparison and list.
When choosing a tool, consider whether your team needs real-time collaboration, resource planning, or detailed project visualization.
Since there is this great Agile manifesto to draw a line on where to focus while working with the methodology, we think it would be great to do the same for hybrid project management and propose a hybrid project management methodology manifesto:
Essentially, it is about creating high-level plans and ditching detailed work breakdown schedules. It is about focusing on why somebody is requesting a project, and what is the expected value. Lastly, it is about collaborating and solving impediments instead of spending time to negotiate a fine-tuned contract for all the possible outcomes.
This is, of course, opinionated and based on our and our customer experience. Feel free to propose modifications or better versions by contacting us.
Hybrid project management is on the rise, thanks to the growing complexity of modern projects. PMI’s Pulse of the Profession® reports show that hybrid project management is growing year-over-year, with organizations prioritizing the balanced approach to mitigate risk in complex projects.
Several factors drive this trend:
Hybrid project management is getting more and more attention. In fact, it was named the top trend in the project management radar.
We at Teamhood strive for the hybrid approach values and our software is tailored to meet the Agile, Waterfall, or Hybrid Project management approach altogether.
If you are keen to see for yourself how Agile can be combined with classic project management, sign up for a Free Teamhood account today!
This heavily depends on project team experience and motivation among project stakeholders. It can vary from extremely fast adoption during few months of piloting towards extreme crash and burn trials for years.
We recommend watching a video about Teamhood project management use case in case of tooling perspective. Otherwise we recommend finding project managers who have experience and can share stories. Ideal place could be your local PMI chapter or Agile meetup.
It would be less popular choice and would mean that smaller amount of examples and resources are available. Though essential idea would not differ much from combining Waterfall and Agile.